Products, Publications, and Presentations
Community Investment One-Pagers
These snapshots are powerful education tools showing the investment FFORC and the SNAP-Ed Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Program at UNC-Chapel Hill have made in communities across North Carolina.
Sadeghzadeh, C., Soldavini, J., Uslan, D., & De Marco, M. (2018). Novel sales tracking method to evaluate a healthy corner store intervention. Health Promotion Practice, published online July 24, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839918789379
De Marco, M., Chapman, L., McGee, C., Calancie, L., Burnham, L., & Ammerman, A. (2017). Merging opposing viewpoints: Analysis of the development of a state-wide Sustainable Local Food Advisory Council in a traditional agricultural state. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 7(3), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2017.073.018
Ammerman A, Hartman TS, De Marco M. (2017). Behavioral Economics and SNAP – Making the Healthy Choice the Easy Choice. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, S145-S150. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcw190.
De Marco, M, Smith, T., Kearney, W., Ammerman, A. (2016). Harvest of Hope: The impact of a church garden project on African American youth and adults in the rural American South. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, 11(3), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/19320248.2016.1146193.
Skinner, H., Calancie, L., Vu, M., Garcia, B., De Marco, M., Ammerman, A., & Schisler, J. (2015). Using Community-Based Participatory Research Principles to Develop More Understandable Recruitment and Informed Consent Documents in Genomic Research. PLoS ONE, 10(5) e0125466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125466.
De Marco, A., De Marco, M, Biggers, A, West, M., Young, J., & Levy, R. (2015). Can People Experiencing Homelessness Acquire Financial Assets? Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 42(4), 55-78.
De Marco, M., Gustafson, A., Gizlice, Z., Ammerman, A. (2014). Locally-Grown Fruit and Vegetable Purchasing Habits and the Association with Children’s Diet. Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition, 9(3), 372-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/19320248.2014.929545.
De Marco, M., Smith, T., Kearney, W., Jones, C. Kearney-Powell, A., & Ammerman, A. (2014). Growing Partners: Building a community-academic partnership to address health disparities in rural North Carolina. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 8(2), 181-186. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2014.0021
Black, K. Z., Hardy, C. Y., De Marco, M., Ammerman, A., Corbie-Smith, G., Council, B., Ellis, D., Eng, E., Harris, B., Jackson, M., Jean-Baptiste, J., Kearney, W., Legerton, M., Parker, D., Wynn, M. & Lightfoot, A. (2013). Beyond Incentives for Involvement to Compensation for Consultants: Increasing Equity in CBPR Approaches. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 7(3), 263-270. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2013.0040.
Lightfoot, A., De Marco, M., Dendas, R., Jackson, M., & Meehan, E. (2014). Engaging Underserved Populations in ACA-required Needs Assessments: A Report from the Field. Special Issue of the Journal for Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, (JHCPU) 25th Anniversary Edition, 25(1), 11-18. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2014.0060.
Jones, B., Lightfoot, A., De Marco, M., Roman Isler, M., Ammerman, A., Nelson, D., Harrison, L., Motsinger, B., Melvin, C., Corbie-Smith, G. (2012). Community Responsive Research Priorities: Transforming Health Research Infrastructure. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, special issue on “The Science of Community Engagement,” 6(3), 339-348. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0045.
Balvanz, P., Barlow, M. De Marco, M., Samuel, K., Crowder, R., & Ammerman, A. (2011). “The Next Generation, That’s Why We Continue To Do What We Do”: Experiences with land loss among African-American farmers in North Carolina. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 1(3), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2011.013.011
De Marco, M., Weiner, B., Meade, S., Hadley, M., Goldmon, M., Boyd, C., Green, M., Manning, M., Godley, P., Howard, D., & Corbie-Smith, G. (2011). Assessing the readiness of Black churches to engage in health disparities research. Journal of the National Medical Association, 103(9-10), 960-7.
De Marco, M., Cykert, S., Coad, N., Doost, K., Schaal, J., White, B., Young, D., Isler, M. R., & Corbie-Smith, G. (2010). Views on personalized medicine: do the attitudes of African American and white prescription drug consumers differ?
Public Health Genomics, 13(5), 276-83. doi: 10.1159/000242199.
De Marco, A. & De Marco, M. (2010). Conceptualization and Measurement of the Neighborhood in Rural Settings: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Community Psychology, 38 (1), 99-114. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20354.
De Marco, M. & Thorburn, S. (2009). The Relationship between Income and Food Insecurity among Oregon Residents: Does Social Support Matter? Public Health Nutrition, 12(11), 2104-2112. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009990243.
De Marco, M., Thorburn, S., & Kue, J. (2009). “In a country as affluent as America, people should be eating:” Qualitative findings from research to explore food insecurity among rural and urban Oregonians. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1010 – 1024. doi: 10.1177/1049732309338868.
De Marco, M. & De Marco, A. (2009). Welcome to the neighborhood: Does where you live affect nutrition, health, and welfare program utilization? Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 36(1), 141-166.
De Marco, M. & Thorburn, S. (2008). The association between sociodemographic factors, participation in assistance programs and food insecurity among Oregon residents. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, 3(1), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/19320240802163506.
FNV (Fruits & Veggies) Social Marketing Campaign in Wisconsin: Strategies for Multi-Sector Collaboration. Amber Canto, MPH, RDN1, Alice Ammerman, DrPH2, Molly M. De Marco, PhD, MPH2 and Erin Aagesen, MS, MPH3, (1)University of Wisconsin-Extension, Cooperative Extension, Madison, WI, (2)University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, (3)University of Wisconsin Extension, Cooperative Extension, Madison, WI. American Public Health Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, November 13, 2018.
Integrating Concepts from Behavioral Economics into Low-Cost Healthy Retail Interventions: Methods and Results from Rural North Carolina. Leah Chapman, MPH1, Claire Sadeghzadeh2, Molly M. De Marco, PhD, MPH2, Daniella Uslan, MPH2, Dwayne Campbell, Ed.D.2 and Bill Kearney3, (1)The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, (2)University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, (3)UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Chapel Hill, NC. American Public Health Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, November 13, 2018.
Communities on the move: A participatory approach to health equity via enhancing groups’ physical activity in North Carolina communities of color. Seth LaJeunesse, CAGS, MCRP, Daniella Uslan, MPH, Judit Alvarado and Molly M. De Marco, PhD, MPH, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. American Public Health Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, November 13, 2018.
Community Circle Dialogue to Address Food Insecurity, Poverty and Racism in North Carolina. Juliana de Groot1, Jessie Phillips1, Tiki Windley, MPA2, Molly De Marco, PhD, MPH2, Bill Kearney2, (1)The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, (2)UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Chapel Hill, NC. Graduate Association of Food Studies Annual Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 4th, 2018.
Research on Behavioral Economics-Based Promotion of Healthy Food Choice in a Retail Setting: Can Results Inform SNAP-Ed Practice? by Molly De Marco, Jessica Soldavini, Tracy Wesley, and Alice Ammerman. This brief describes strategies for communicating research findings to program managers and practitioners in USDA’s SNAP-Ed program, potentially leading to new intervention approaches that could impact the well-being of the many Americans reached by the SNAP-Ed program. BECR Center Briefs and Tools.
A Researcher’s Checklist for Working with Sales Data to Evaluate Healthy Retail Interventions by Molly De Marco, Christina Chauvenet, Leah Chapman, and Danton Noriega-Goodwin. This brief aims to provide an overview of key considerations for researchers who wish to use sales data to evaluate the effectiveness of healthy retail interventions. This brief discusses key considerations for identifying the research question, forming a partnership with retailers, and data collection and analysis. BECR Center Briefs and Tools.
What’s in it for Retailers? Establishing Partnerships with Food Retailers to Conduct Healthy Food Choice Research by Molly De Marco, Leah Chapman, and Nasir Siddique. Food retailers can and should be seen as vital partners as we work to improve nutrition. This brief provides insights and strategies for establishing research partnerships with food retailers. This brief represents accumulated insights from researchers working with the following programs and projects: SNAP-Ed, BECR, NC Growing Together, and the RNECE-South, who have conducted healthy food retail interventions for 5 years with over 20 different corporate and family-owned retailers. BECR Center Briefs and Tools.
Uses of Behavioral Economics Nudges within Healthy Retail Interventions in the SNAP-Ed Program: Research Opportunities by Daniella Uslan, Jessica Soldavini, Molly De Marco, Terry Hartman, and Alice Ammerman. In collaboration with the UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, the BECR Center drafted a brief to discuss the potential research opportunities for using behavioral economics strategies within the SNAP-Ed Program. This brief highlights text from the 2017 SNAP Education Plan Guidance. BECR Center Briefs and Tools.
Choosing Foods and Beverages to Promote in Healthy Retail Research by Terry Hartman, Molly De Marco, Megan Lott, Jessica Soldavini, Madelaine Katz, Alice Ammerman, and Mary Story. Purchasing a healthy mix of food items is a key step toward improving diet and health. Researchers are increasingly focusing on this step, investigating strategies to promote healthy food purchasing. However, in a retail setting that encompasses thousands of items, choosing products to promote that are most likely to have a positive impact on consumers’ diets may require consideration. The purpose of this brief is to provide behavioral researchers with a quick reference to help determine which types of products to promote. BECR Center Briefs and Tools.
Behavioral Economics in the Healthy Retail Environment: Working Within the SNAP-Ed Context by Alice Ammerman, Molly De Marco, and Daniella Uslan. The Regional Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Centers of Excellence (RNECE) Southern Region at UNC- Chapel Hill recently presented a webinar on behavioral economics within the SNAP-Ed context. The field of Behavioral Economics provides valuable insight in understanding people’s behaviors and decision-making processes. This webinar will introduce key concepts from Behavioral Economics and discuss how SNAP-Ed agencies can leverage these concepts to “nudge” consumers to make healthier food choices in a retail setting. Materials: Slide deck / Recording. BECR Center Briefs and Tools.
Buying Wisely and Well: Managing WIC Food Costs While Improving the WIC Customer’s Shopping Experience by Alice Ammerman, Molly De Marco, Matthew Harding, Terry Hartman, and Jewels Rhode. In July 2015, the BECR Center hosted a roundtable to discuss exploratory and innovative behavioral economics strategies that might be useful in helping the WIC Program manage food costs without adversely impacting participant redemptions, program satisfaction, and participation. This brief provides a summary of the discussion that took place during the meeting, based on five white papers funded by the BECR Center as well as the accompanying discussion. BECR Center Briefs and Tools.
Review of the Literature on Use of Behavioral Economic Nudges in Farmers’ Markets and More Traditional Retail Settings by Hannah Pettus, a master’s student from the Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Behavioral Economic nudges offer a range of techniques for influencing food-choice related behaviors in retail settings, including convenience stores, grocery stores and farmers’ markets. We summarize the research to date that has used behavioral economic techniques to nudge consumers to make healthier choices in places where we shop for food. BECR Center Briefs and Tools.